Webb“reasonable or moderate chastisement” unconstitutional. This article, while not a case comment, focuses on this case, and discusses some of the arguments highlighted by the defendant as well as one of the amici curiae in support of the reasonable chastisement defence. It also assesses the extent to which those arguments carry weight when http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2024/34.pdf
“Smacking” children to be indefensible - PG McMahon
WebbThe Court considered that chastisement involves, by definition, the causing of displeasure, discomfort, fear or hurt and that the actual or potential hurt that flows from physical chastisement is believed to have a greater effect than other reasonably available methods of … WebbIn a judgment handed down on 18 September 2024, the Constitutional Court confirmed a 2024 decision by the High Court of Gauteng which had found the common law defence of ‘reasonable and moderate chastisement’ to be unconstitutional. reading township police department
What is reasonable chastisement? Law Society of Scotland
Webb29 nov. 2024 · They argue that the reasonable chastisement defence unjustifiably limited children’s rights to dignity, equal protection of the law, freedom from violence, and bodily and psychological integrity, amongst others. They maintained that any form of violence amounts to assault, and that where an adult would have legal recourse, children do not. WebbAlthough the Children Act 2004 removed the recourse to the “reasonable punishment” defence for any offence more severe than common assault, at the time the Crown … WebbSection 58 Children Act 2004removes the availability of the reasonable chastisement defence for parents or adults acting in loco parentis where the accused is charged with … reading township pa permits